What is a stated consequence of not allowing induced abortions, according to the content?

What is a stated consequence of not allowing induced abortions, according to the content?

• A. Women may seek dangerous alternatives such as closet abortions.
• B. There would be no changes in behavior or outcomes.
• C. Hospitals would refuse all abortions regardless of circumstances.
• D. Pregnancies would always end in adoption.

Answer: (A)

When access to induced abortion is restricted, the expected outcome described is that people will still need or want abortions and will often turn to dangerous, unregulated methods. This reflects the idea that prohibition doesn’t erase demand; it pushes it underground, leading to unsafe options like closet abortions that pose serious health risks. The other possibilities—no change in behavior, universal hospital refusals, or pregnancies always ending in adoption—don’t align with the stated understanding that restrictions tend to increase harm by driving people toward unsafe alternatives rather than eliminating the act itself.

When access to induced abortion is restricted, the expected outcome described is that people will still need or want abortions and will often turn to dangerous, unregulated methods. This reflects the idea that prohibition doesn’t erase demand; it pushes it underground, leading to unsafe options like closet abortions that pose serious health risks. The other possibilities—no change in behavior, universal hospital refusals, or pregnancies always ending in adoption—don’t align with the stated understanding that restrictions tend to increase harm by driving people toward unsafe alternatives rather than eliminating the act itself.